tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21883778.post114921227183067822..comments2024-03-09T05:19:25.071-05:00Comments on blah blah blog: Ceci n'est pas un Matissedarahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12523353095030819242noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21883778.post-1149264794973714342006-06-02T12:13:00.000-04:002006-06-02T12:13:00.000-04:00Yeah, I get the "primitive." Actually, that's wha...Yeah, I get the "primitive." Actually, that's what I meant when I made the Gauguin reference. Of course, the difference there is that my primitiveness is not purposeful, it's due to a lack of brush control.<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://images.google.com/images?q=Emil+Nolde&hl=en&lr=&rls=SUNA,SUNA:2006-07,SUNA:en&sa=X&oi=images&ct=title" REL="nofollow">Nolde</A>'s work is pretty interesting. Mine's not watercolor, though, it's acrylic on canvas. I think I would have had an easier time with matching and mixing the colors if it were watercolor.<BR/><BR/>And when I made the Van Gogh comparison, I meant that I used <B>A LOT</B> of paint. Especially on the vase and bowls.darahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12523353095030819242noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21883778.post-1149264172768356902006-06-02T12:02:00.000-04:002006-06-02T12:02:00.000-04:00OK, I'm not trying to suck up or anything, but you...OK, I'm not trying to suck up or anything, but your version is pretty great. I like that DaDa-esque, primitive feeling sort of thing going on. And the color in nice too. Reminds me of the watercolor stuff by Emil Nolde. I'm not kidding.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com